Blog

Talking of judges that doexercise judicial impunity and rascality in Nigeria today, the name of Justice Isaac Deinde Dipeolu of the Federal High Court in Lagos State will always make the list as a result of his abuse of judicial power.

Finding by this newspaper indicated that Justice Isaac Deinde Dipeolu is a man with no integrity and also with shocking and remarkably bad judicial decision, often considered a serious error or abuse of power.

Two years ago, Justice Dipeolu was accused of gross judicial impunity while handling the forfeiture of assets case of former CBN Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, and he was compelled to excuse himself from the case immediately there were media reports that he had been financially induced.

Apart from that, Dipeolu is still facing media back lashes over his October 25, 2025 Order that Lotus Bank should take over the assets both movable and unmovable of Unpacked Limited , a firm.ownes by Feyikemi Abiodu and guaranteed by Oluwafeni Badewole.

The public outcries over that are that there were many technical errors in the ruling.

Over the time, Justice Dipeolu has made several wrongful convictions. In most of his rulings especially in criminal cases, the judge has made judicial decisions that have led to innocent persons being convicted even though they would later get fair hearings at higher courts.

Judges are allowed to use their discretion in few cases but for Justice Deinde Dipeolu, it’s an abuse of discretion. Some of his discretions are grossly unfair and unreasonable.

Apart from undermining justice, Justice Isaac Dipeolu’s egregious decisions have eroded trust in the Nigeria legal system, and because he isn’t checked by the authorities, his judicial rascality has damaged the country’s judiciary’s reputation. Also, his reputation has been badly harned as a result of his recklessness.

To get remedies from the bad decisions of Justice Dipeolu, many victims have had to appeal his judicial decisions at higher courts where most of his decisions had been reviewed and faulted by higher judges.

The latest judicial rascality of Justice Isaac Deinde Dipeolu is the granting of ex parte orders in the Nestoil case where he wrongly appointed a receiver/manager over Neconde’s interest in OML 42.

And according to judicial analysts, the judge’s decision was the height of judicial impunity because the Order was one-sided as it was granted without hearing the story of the person or persons against whom the order is made.

Analysts who have roundly condemned the inactions of Justice Dipeolu over the Order stated that he erred as he only had the power to grant such Orders in cases of exceptional urgency where the subject matter of the suit will likely be destroyed or dissipated irretrievably if the order was not made immediately.

Recall that the suit was brought based on the alleged default by Nestoil in the payment of loans granted by a group of banks to the company. Whereas, Nestoil and its promoters had provided various assets as collateral to secure the repayment of the Nestoil loans.

However, the Nestoil lenders appointed First Trustees to hold the collateral
on their behalf. The Nestoil lenders also reserved the power, acting through First Trustees, to appoint a receiver/manager to take over Nestoil and the Nestoil loan collateral if Nestoil defaulted in the repayment of the Nestoil loans.

Perhaps Justice Isaac Dipeolu has forgotten that under the Law, the Nestoil lenders exercised this power by appointing Mr. Abubakar Sulu-Gambari SAN as receiver/manager pursuant to a deed of appointment dated August 21, 2025.

It’s important to inform the public that prior to the recent events, the Nestoil lenders requested that Neconde’s interest in OML 42 should be provided as additional collateral for the repayment of the Nestoil loans. But Neconde had used its interest in OML 42 as a collateral to secure the loans it obtained from another group of banks. Therefore, in law and common sense, the only way Neconde may provide its interest in OML 42 as additional collateral to the Nestoil lenders was if (a)
the Neconde lenders permitted Neconde to do so, and (b) the collateral taken by the Nestoil lenders in OML 42 will be inferior to the collateral already held by the Neconde lenders, i.e., the Nestoil lenders will exercise their right only AFTER the Neconde lenders have exercised their right over the collateral in the event of a default. Neconde and the Nestoil lenders signed an agreement on this
basis. In this instance, this would have created a “second ranking charge” for the Nestoil lenders.

It’s also important to state that the Neconde lenders refused to permit Neconde to create a second ranking charge in favour of the Nestoil lenders. So, the Nestoil lenders did not obtain a second ranking charge over Neconde’s
interest in OML 42 or any of Neconde’s assets.

These facts are in the documents First Trustees presented to Hon. Justice Dideolu and on the basis of which he made the ex parte orders but, he made the following order against Neconde as order no. 5: “That an order is hereby made granting leave to the Receiver/Manager to take over the 2nd
Defendant’s [Neconde] office situate at 41/42 Akin Adesola Street, Victoria Island, Lagos; any other asset of the 2nd Defendant wherever it may be found within the jurisdiction of this Court; and/or the 2nd Defendant’s interest in OML 42 JV by virtue of the Deed of Appointment dated 21st of August
2025, pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice”.

Meanwhile, the “Receiver/Manager” is the receiver/manager appointed by the Nestiol
lenders, who have no collateral or other legal right over Neconde or Neconde’s interest in OML 42, and Justice Dipeolu therefore wrongly wiped out the collateral held by the Neconde lenders by placing Neconde under receivership in favour of the Nestoil lenders who do not have any collateral or charge over Neconde or its assets.

Legal analysta said that Justice Dipeolu, an experienced judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria was induced by extra judicial considerations for him to exercise that egregious judicial impunity.

Expectedly, four of the Neconde lenders have already filed an application to be joined in the matter with a view to setting aside the orders made against Neconde because the order has no basis in fact and in law.

However, legal analysts have hailed the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja, Justice Tsoho over his decision to direct Justice Dipeolu to withdraw from the suit based on the petition presented by the Nestoil Group to the National Judicial Council.

According to them, what Justice Tsoho did is the standard practice once a petition against a judicial officer has been presented to the NJC. “In fact, upon becoming aware of the petition, Justice Dipeolu ought to have recused himself from the matter with immediate effect without the necessity of the intervention of the Hon. Chief Judge” analysts said.

Analysts also condemned an allegation that Justice Tsoho was given a bribe of $5m to give his directive that Justice Dipeolu should excuse himself from the Nestoil case..

They wrote that it’s unfortunate that
Justice Dipeolu’s handlers have chosen to mount a campaign of calumny against Hon. Justice Tsoho just because he gave a directive that would redeem the integrity of the Nigeria judicial system.

The wrote: “A judge like Justice Dipeolu, who has consistently recklessly abused his judicial oath of office by making decisions that are induced by extra-judicial considerations ought to be flushed out of the. judiciary. His “fans” should help him to help himself by advising him to resign his office as a judge”

A scandal has erupted over the controversial orders made by Justice Dehinde Dipeolu on October 25, 2025, in the ongoing legal dispute between Nestoil and FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited. The case, filed under Suit No. FHC/L/CS/2127/2025, has sparked controversy as the First Charge Holders—Glencore Energy UK Limited, Fidelity Bank Plc, Mauritius Commercial Bank, and African Finance Corporation—mount pressure to have the Ex-parte orders reversed.

The First Charge Holders claim the orders, which granted Nestoil the ability to appoint a receiver/manager over the assets of the Defendants, were obtained through misrepresentation. They argue that these orders unlawfully hinder their access to manage their financial interests, particularly concerning the 2nd Defendant, Neconde Energy Limited. The Senior Lenders filed an application on November 6, 2025, seeking to join the suit and have the orders set aside.

In a detailed 335-page submission, the Senior Lenders stated that the Ex-parte orders were unlawfully granted, and they accused the Plaintiffs of misrepresentation. They also sought the removal of Mr. Abubakar Sulu-Gambari, the Receiver/Manager appointed by the Plaintiff. According to the affidavit filed by the Senior Lenders, Neconde’s interest in OML 42, which had already been pledged as collateral to secure loans from the First Charge Holders, was improperly included in the Plaintiff’s motion.

Despite this, Justice Dipeolu granted orders against Neconde’s assets, including the OML 42 interest, even though no consent was given by the First Charge Holders. Moreover, the Common Term Agreement presented by the Plaintiffs did not authorize any additional charge on the 2nd Defendant’s assets. This has raised significant legal concerns about the legitimacy of the orders granted by the judge.

The controversy deepens as the Plaintiffs’ motion, which included orders for police, Navy, and DSS involvement, directed the seizure of Neconde’s assets, including crude oil and its interest in OML 42. These actions have led to accusations that the orders were overly harsh and aimed at destroying the Defendants’ business operations.

Legal experts have cited previous Supreme Court rulings, such as the ECOBANK vs. Honeywell Flour Mills case, to highlight that such Ex-parte Orders should not be granted without proper justification. Critics argue that Justice Dipeolu’s actions, including restricting the personal bank accounts of Nestoil’s directors, may constitute an abuse of power, potentially subjecting him to scrutiny by the National Judicial Council.

The case is now drawing attention for its implications on judicial discretion, with growing concerns over the use of Ex-parte Orders in commercial disputes. With accusations of bias and recklessness, many are calling for a thorough investigation into Justice Dipeolu’s handling of the case.

…Groups commend his exceptional leadership and reforms at FIRS

A coalition of nine Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) has tendered a public and unreserved apology to the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Dr Zacch Adedeji, after new findings and clarifications cleared him of all allegations of corruption, money laundering, and abuse of office earlier circulated during a protest.

The apology followed a recent protest by the Coalition of Anti-Corruption Civil Society Organisations for Development (COCSOD) at the National Assembly, where the group had accused top FIRS officials of financial misconduct. After a thorough review and verification of their claims, the coalition acknowledged that the allegations were unfounded and based on unverified information.

In a joint statement issued in Abuja, the leaders of the CSOs expressed deep regret over the embarrassment caused to Dr Adedeji, his family, and the FIRS as an institution, noting that the earlier protest was misguided.

The statement was jointly signed by: Dr. Emeka Mbonu, President, Organisation of Young Entrepreneurs in Nigeria; Chief (Mrs) Osondu Chinelo, Convener, Citizens Right International; Dr. Oluaseun Ayotomiwa, National Coordinator, Advocacy for Good Governance; Amb. Eyitayo Olukayode, Coordinator, Centre for Leadership and Educational Development; Hajia Zainabu Mohammed, Convener, Africa Patriotic Development Mission

Others are, Dr. Usman Aliyu Yahaya, Executive Director, Zero Tolerance and Anti-Corruption Network; Princess Doubra Abadi-Ingobo, Coordinator, Network Against Poverty in Africa Campaign; Eduvie Samuel Efe, Executive Director, Campaign Against Corruption International; and Comrade Otokpa Echechofu Philip, Convener, Network for Advancement of Democracy in Africa.

“We have now confirmed that the information we relied upon during the protest was inaccurate and not properly verified,” the coalition stated.

“We sincerely apologise to Dr Zacch Adedeji for any harm, embarrassment, or misunderstanding caused by the claims in the protest statement. We equally commend his exemplary leadership, integrity, and the reforms he has championed at the FIRS.”

Since assuming office over two years ago, Dr Zacch Adedeji has repositioned the Federal Inland Revenue Service as a model of transparency, innovation, and professionalism. His tenure has been defined by visionary reforms, fiscal discipline, and the digital transformation of Nigeria’s tax system.

Under his leadership, the FIRS has consistently surpassed its revenue targets. In 2023, it generated ₦12.36 trillion against a target of ₦11.55 trillion, and in 2024, the agency collected ₦21.7 trillion, exceeding its ₦19.7 trillion projection. Between September 2023 and August 2025, the Service realised ₦46 trillion in total tax revenue, representing 115 per cent of its combined targets.

These achievements were driven by innovative reforms, enhanced staff productivity, and the introduction of technology-driven tax solutions that improved compliance and reduced leakages.

Under Adedeji’s leadership, the FIRS launched several digital tools, including TaxPro-Max, e-Invoicing, and USSD tax payment services, automating over 80 per cent of manual processes and simplifying taxpayer engagement.

He also introduced the National Single Window Project, which harmonises government revenue processes and enhances trade facilitation at ports. In addition, the creation of One-Stop-Shop offices nationwide has improved accessibility and reduced bottlenecks for taxpayers.

Dr Adedeji’s management style is anchored on service, accountability, and inclusion. He prioritises taxpayer satisfaction, vendor relations, and staff welfare, creating a culture of transparency and excellence within the Service.

“We are committed to fair tax administration through responsive and accessible service to optimise revenue for national development,” Dr Adedeji has consistently affirmed.

Beyond meeting revenue goals, Dr Adedeji has focused on increasing Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio from 10.8 per cent to 18 per cent, aligning it with the African average. His administration has also strengthened non-oil revenue streams, reduced dependence on crude oil, and enhanced the country’s economic resilience through data-driven fiscal strategies.

The coalition appreciated Nigerians for their understanding and reaffirmed its dedication to promoting accountability and justice. It also pledged that its future advocacy efforts would be guided strictly by verified and factual information.

“We now clearly recognise that Dr Adedeji’s leadership of the FIRS has been one of integrity, innovation, and excellence. We hereby withdraw our earlier claims in their entirety and extend our sincere apology to him and the institution he leads,” the statement concluded.

As Dr Zacch Adedeji continues his reform-focused stewardship at the FIRS, many Nigerians and development stakeholders have commended his tenure as a shining example of effective public service and transparent governance.

Abuja, November 10, 2025 — The Nigerian Navy has rescued 10 crew members from a distressed vessel, MV SEMA III, which was en route to Calabar from Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.

Director of Naval Information, Commodore Ayiwuyor Adams-Aliu, announced this in a statement on Monday in Abuja, describing the operation as a demonstration of the Navy’s swift response capability and commitment to saving lives at sea.

According to him, the rescue was conducted by personnel of the Forward Operating Base (FOB) IBAKA on Friday, following a distress call received around 8:00 p.m.

“A naval gunboat equipped with a submersible pump was immediately deployed. On arrival, the team discovered the vessel taking in water and promptly evacuated all occupants, comprising one Cameroonian, one Equatorial Guinean, and eight Nigerians,” Adams-Aliu said.

The rescued crew members were safely brought to FOB IBAKA, where they were received, debriefed, and provided with care until Saturday.

“The Master of MV SEMA III expressed heartfelt gratitude to the Nigerian Navy for its timely intervention and exceptional professionalism,” he added.

Adams-Aliu said the successful operation reflects the Navy’s renewed efforts to enhance maritime safety, protect national assets, and support lawful economic activities within Nigeria’s maritime domain.

In a related development, the Chief of the Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Idi Abbas, recently approved the appointment and redeployment of 65 Rear Admirals across various commands, institutions, and departments of the Nigerian Navy and Armed Forces — part of broader efforts to strengthen operational efficiency and security coordination.

The President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Prof. Chris Piwuna, has accused the Federal Government of failing to prioritise education, saying its officials do not treat the sector’s challenges as a national concern requiring collective effort.

Speaking during The Toyin Falola Interviews on Sunday in a virtual session themed “A Conversation with the ASUU President,” Piwuna said indifference among key government officials has hindered meaningful reforms in Nigeria’s education system.

According to him, members of the Federal Executive Council often view the problems facing education as the sole responsibility of the Minister of Education.

“Members of the government, the ministers, and chief executives do not see the problem of education as a problem that affects them,” he said. “When ASUU declares a strike, the Minister of Finance sees it as the Minister of Education’s problem, the Minister of Science and Technology sees it the same way. But if the Minister of Finance understood that the country’s economic growth depends on a knowledgeable workforce, he would take the Minister of Education’s problem as his own.”

Piwuna criticised the government’s attitude toward education, saying it is worsened by corruption and ideological conflicts.

“We in ASUU see education as a public good, but those in government treat it as a capitalist venture—something only important if it generates profit. Many now even suggest that TETFund should start funding private universities. Self-interest and contract inflation have replaced public service. That is why TETFund has become a marketplace,” he said.

The ASUU leader also revealed that the union’s ongoing negotiations with the Federal Government are nearing conclusion, adding that the government’s current salary offer remains “unacceptable.”

“What the government is offering us as salaries is nothing to write home about, and we are ready to go any length to fight it. Some of our colleagues sleep in their offices with their families due to poor living conditions. How can such people be expected to conduct research or seek endowments?” he added.

Other discussants at the event included historian and host Prof. Toyin Falola; University of Ibadan scholar, Prof. Francis Egbokhare; economist Prof. Sherrifdeen Tella; Nigeria Labour Congress President, Joe Ajaero; and journalist Grace Edema of The PUNCH.

Prof. Egbokhare blamed poor leadership and weak accountability structures for the decay in Nigeria’s university system. “You look around our universities and see poorly constructed buildings in an era when sustainable design should be standard. We must fix leadership and integrity issues within our universities,” he said.

He also argued that universities could generate income if government agencies patronised them for research, consultancy, and training services.

On his part, NLC President Joe Ajaero urged ASUU and the government to take a holistic approach to education reform, stressing that the crisis extends beyond universities. “Beyond autonomy, we must also address the state of primary and secondary education,” he said.

Economist Prof. Sherrifdeen Tella noted that Nigeria’s disregard for research has contributed to its underdevelopment. “When farmers plant improved seeds and get better yields, it’s due to academic research. Unfortunately, the system has neglected research for too long,” he said.

ASUU has historically resorted to strikes to press home its demands, citing unmet agreements, withheld salaries, promotion arrears, and poor funding of public universities. The current round of negotiations with the Federal Government, Piwuna hinted, may determine whether another industrial action looms.